Today I’ll be thinking about recruitment, the skills we’ll need from and possible timescales for a Development Worker.
I suspect this and the architects drawings will take up a lot of Monday night’s meeting tomorrow. The cash from National Lottery is in the bank account.
If we were to get the job description written by mid July we’d be doing well. That means the advert out end July – is that a wise time? Interviews taking place by end of Aug. Start end Sept? Maybe, given it will be a few days a month, there might be scope to start sooner, so say Sept start.
That might be realistic. We should have had decent meetings with the council by then and have a clearer idea of where we stand and what we have to do. We ought to have the SCIO in place by then. We’ll have settled on designs to be tested/costed by our architects and heritage consultant. We’ll have a few more funding application on, principally Scottish Land Fund and Architectural Heritage Fund.
So my first view is we want someone who can represent us in council meetings, skilled in contract negotiations, experienced with heritage building projects. Ideally they’ll have experience of securing funding for such projects too and of course be commercially aware as they might well bring in first clients. If they have experience in community consultation all the better.
If they start in Sept, then the payment for that month will be in Oct. Let’s assume we keep back £2K for costs like IT and expenses and employ them at £1000 per month (40 hours/month) for 8 months. They’d be with us Sept 2021 to April 2022. Hopefully by then we’d have secured more funding to keep them on and increase the hours or, if they wish to move on to the next project, to recruit the person to run and develop the building.
These are the things that play on my mind each day as we try to navigate a project to take Portobello Town Hall into community management. Just light, fluffy things.
Please note, this does not constitute an job advert and might well change significantly in thinking and direction before any job advert is created. Just sharing today’s reflections to keep the blog coming.
Having slept on it again the architects’ meeting was perhaps not as daunting. They’d read the blog and could sense the fear. They reassured me that the building is in good condition and will need minimal repairs, not insignificant repairs but not everything needs sorted for the building to open. Guess we need to find that base level and a path to new things. I knew that was the journey but had forgotten the first bit in the overwhelm of the second. They also said that feeling frightened showed we were thinking about it. The term they used that has floated to the front of my memory or consciousness of what we have is a ‘seaside pavilion’ – for performances and community assembly not a town hall carrying out civic functions. Let’s let that percolate and see what it becomes.
Interesting detail that came out the report: the original building, Inverey House dates from before 1840. In 1893 it was bought by John Christie and after inheriting money he set up three female orphanages, the first of which was Inverey House. By 1901 there were fifty girls, two assistants and a matron living in the house as well as a nurse being employed. They extended to build a new playroom and laundry/washhouse in 1903 which is now Lothian Dance Academy so you can imagine Miss Morag was excited by that news and the discovery of the original drawings for her building.
With regard to the industrial schools the report states:
‘Created in the nineteenth century, Industrial schools were related to reform/borstal schools but, rather than being sentenced to one after a crime had been committed, they tended to act more as a form of orphanage, with children either being removed from their families or taken from a situation of vagrancy or destitution and given the opportunity of vocation education. During the course of the 19th century, the definitions between reform and industrial schools became more blurred, especially as many were, like Inverey House, privately run charitable establishments. The general principle was one of teaching discipline and technical skills. For females this would consist of skills suitable to get work in domestic service or be suitable ‘for the matrimonial market’.
Often industrial schools were run as little more than centres for slave labour, often using the ‘immoral background’ of the older girls and women as reasons or excuses for abuse. At Inverey House, from the age of the girls, it appears more likely that the school acted as an orphanage type school, with the ages running from 8-14, and containing several sets of siblings. Although very little is recorded about life here, the will of John Christie (and its contestation) suggests that it was not the worst of its type. His family had contested the will in which he had left money for further expansion of his childrens’ homes: “Mr Christie ordered more expensive furniture for the home at Tenterdean than his own house- the furniture was of a kind not suited for an orphanage”.
Having slept on it, I’m conscious of the enormity of the task ahead and the potential to get it wrong. The Town Hall cannot open as was. Even basic changes to give proper access to the building are not easy to achieve. With no funding, we cannot progress. To secure funding we need a costed, definite design. To get a definite costed design we need community buy-in following a consultation exercise. How do you do that without funding?
We’re going to have to get serious on our list of essential jobs to be costed and the design we want to follow yet who are ‘we’?
Who are we?
‘We’ are the board of the SCIO that doesn’t yet exist but it can’t be just that handful of people. It will include interested partners and helpers but it will be the SCIO trustees who take the decisions.
‘We’ will include a (very) part time Development Manager, contracted perhaps by Portobello Central company or perhaps, more likely by Porty Central SCIO, who can hone our vision and drive it forward but we don’t have them yet.
‘We’ will include funders who need to know we have consulted our community.
‘We’ is definitely the community, so how to bring them on the architectural journey?
‘We’ has to be CEC who are likely to be the owners for a good while yet, as we slowly secure funding to allow any transfer. Not a simple process!
Meanwhile I’ve have an approach from Porty Community Energy to see if they might get access to the Electric Vehicle charger located in Portobello Town Hall for a trial electric car club vehicle. I’ve passed it to our contact at the Council in the hope it can progress. The existing charger was only used for council vehicles. It does seem to be mad that there is a working EV charge point in the heart of Portobello not being used but taking forward this on paper good idea will have all sorts of access and insurance issues. We’ve brokered the intro, so let’s see what comes of it.
Held the blog back till after the architect’s meeting today at 4pm and we’ve only just finished at 6.15pm. That will have messed with Geoff’s daily routine so I had checked with him earlier that he’d be okay posting after 6pm. He will be posting post gin o’clock.
Prior to the meeting I had read the draft Viability Appraisal by Munro Allison Architects & Rob Robinson Heritage Consulting, even read the draft Conservation Policies and will go back to them now I know what they are. These are important given funding comes from the Architectural Heritage Fund and that money comes from Historic Environment Scotland. I confess I hadn’t downloaded the drawings and still haven’t. A job for over the weekend. Suspect they merit being printed out and properly poured over.
We were presented with two high level options 1) New Life and 2) More Space and within those four variations of what we might do. We also got a Summary of Condition report detailing the works which were immediate, urgent, necessary and desirable. Not sure I could even summarise more than that yet. Lots of food for thought and possibilities and lots of conundrums that are not easy to solve. I need to go process what I’ve seen and heard.
It was only myself, Morag and Geoff who attended. We’ll need to get the others up to speed and then bring in the wider community. I’m wondering about uploading the documents to the website for you all to consider….maybe some kind of consultation.
We closed with the intention of getting back to Rob, our heritage consultant, with a defined option to be costed by August. With a good wind the SCIO will be through by then and that new body, which eventually will have elected Trustees, can settle the course for the building. Well, within the confines of available funding they can.
There is going to be a lot happening in August and September.
Still haven’t heard from the Council officials and we have chased.
A buzzy, busy team meeting on Zoom yesterday evening. By the end everyone was there and we were joined by a potential new member for the second half. We all had a wee celebration over the Awards for All grant then it was down to checking with Will and Damian where they are with the job spec and advert. Written by the end of the month is the plan.
Other exciting news was that Geoff had received the architects’ report and drawings an hour or so before the meeting. He’d only glanced at them but was pleased with some of the ideas and innovations he’d picked up so far. That will be my homework – to read that before Thursday’s meeting. Oh, we’ve decided to revert to Zoom as getting the numbers we have indoors seemed just too difficult/unclear/not allowed under the current Level 2 guidelines as far as we could work out. Maybe next time.
Today’s excitement is meeting with our new contact at Scottish Land Fund this morning. Meanwhile I picked up yesterday that a new SLF committee has been appointed. Makes for interesting reading.
Last night when browsing Facebook I noticed North Edinburgh Arts and Whale with others are advertising for a project co-ordinator as part of their successful Culture Collective funding award from Creative Scotland . Porty Central were part of a bid led by Action Porty for that same fund but were not successful. Doesn’t mean I’ve given up on that as part of a vision for Portobello. Fancy the post?
Must pay Morag for her expenses in getting the thank you cards printed. For now that means finding the cheque book and getting double signatures but Geoff is working on getting double approval payment processes on our Triodos bank account. I’ll need to login to our online banking and look out for the arrival in our account of the Awards for All cash.
I hope tomorrow will be a positive summary of the SLF meeting. Till then, au revoir.
It used to be the name of a long-gone credit card – giving you Access to untold pleasures from spending your own money. Today it is part of our equalities agenda.
Last night, I saw some early drawings from our architects of what could be done, might be done, should be done and must be done to bring the Town Hall up to date. I’m not sure of the sequence of their thinking but by starting from securing modern standards of accessibility they end up radically improving the Hall for all.
For example, one idea is to remove the grotty, awkward, second class wheel chair ramp at the east side and instead make the front entrance much grander. I had thought this would be difficult in a listed building but the Government did it a long time ago on the “A” listed St Andrews House on Regent Road.
Our Town Hall would get a pair of elegant, gently sloping ramps along the front façade, leading to an extended platform and steps at the front door. At a stroke, we get a grand entrance for all, a ceremonial site, worthy of our ambitions for New Life for the Heart of Portobello. The pavement outside would have to be adjusted a bit but we are getting used to that.
Meanwhile, thinking through access to spaces inside means having a lift (or even two). This is why we employ architects to see through to a better way of organising space.
Keep calm, none of this may happen as it all costs money but we if we don’t aim for quality and equality we end up with the wrong outcome. I’m pushing for the best.
Started the day in a very middle aged Porty woman way with a dook in the Forth with a friend at 6am. Chill wind but beautiful. Certainly sets you up for the day.
I’m not the only one who indulges in the water and Jon caught two others (Lynn and Jayne) of our group preparing for a swim over the weekend.
Geoff likes an early morning swim but he prefers the Commonwealth Pool (5.30am). Not sure of the swimming habits of the others. Maybe we’ll convince Miss Morag in to the sea one of these days.
So team catch up on Zoom tonight. Jayne has done her superb job, as ever, of agenda setting. We have some guests joining us and I’m looking forward to hearing what Sally and Lynn have to report back from the Comms group.
Regeneration application was sent to our contact at the Council for his review before submission on 17 June. Geoff and I meet SLF for a Teams chat tomorrow and the risk assessment for the meeting with the architects on Thursday is being done. Never a dull moment.
This Sunday seems a quieter day on Porty Central matters but I will be spending this afternoon carrying out interviews for the post of Office Admin with the team at my other community project, Bellfield, run by Action Porty. Hopefully we’ll soon be advertising for the Porty Central Development Worker. Porty Central business will come round again with the weekly team meeting taking place tomorrow evening.
Seems a good day to pause, reflect and share the paper Jon put together for our strategy day just after we’d got the Council decision on 20 May. It took the metaphor we’d been kicking around of having a mountain still to climb and fleshed it out. For all the work and triumph on 20 May we’d ‘only’ reached basecamp. As Jon notes, ‘it takes a lot of effort just to get to basecamp’. Most never do. However ‘the gates are still locked, the place is empty and unused.’ Can we get to ‘Camp 1’ when ‘the building can open for a trial event’? No denying ‘lots of infrastructure needs to be put in place to cross the perilous icefall and reach Camp 1’ but that is our next destination We might make it. We might need to turn back. If we do, and we get off the mountain alive, we can plan a re-ascent. I’ll leave you there to browse the document to see how and when we might reach the summit and how we have defined the summit. That can be a topic for a future blog.
Of course the article, as is so often the case when you know the story details, gets things a bit wrong. In regard to Portobello Central (which is not named) it says ‘More recently, residents of Portobello have taken additional land into the hands of the community after the City of Edinburgh Council accepted a proposal for community management of its local town hall.’ Maybe they are being prophetic but right now all that was accepted was our right to be at the table to negotiate for the right to community manage Portobello Town Hall.
Don’t forget about The Wash House AGM on Wed 16 June – this week. Tickets need to be booked before to obtain the Zoom link .
Friday is a busy work day for me so there is not usually much done by me on Portobello Central work on Fridays but I’d passed the baton of the Regeneration Capital Grant Fund (RCGF) application over to Geoff on Thursday night.
On Thursday night sitting in my car “office” while my daughter was at athletics, listening to the Friends of Porty Prom AGM on zoom on my phone, still flying high from the Awards for All £10,000 success on Thursday, I had boldly reworked the numbers up and decided to ask for £820,000 of funding on a £1.3M project.
In for a penny, in for a pound. Nothing ventured, nothing gained and any other cliches you care to throw into the joys of funding applications. You have to be in to win?
Geoff duly did his magic on Friday and edited my long, garbled version into a shorter, more coherent version. You have 3 pages at font size 12 to answer 9 set questions in the RCGF, plus a page for the sums. We’ve settled on asking for £370,000 of urgent works to make the building safe and £450,000 to swap out the ageing boilers and replace them with an energy efficient, carbon neutral, alternative on a project of £1.3M (including revenue costs). The baton was back to me Friday night and all I really had to do was approve the changes, The application has been shared round the team today and will be sent to our council contact Sunday evening. Keep everything crossed for us.
Meanwhile others were working away on Porty Central business; Lynn has had good funding conversations with funders of social entrepreneurs and Geoff chased up the Council for an official next step and we got a mention in the Daily Record on Friday night.
This is part of the launch of the Scottish Land Commission’s#MyLandScotlandcampaign to inspire people to think about land differently. The focus of the article was Bellfield but yours truly sneaked in a Portobello Central mention saying:
“I am lucky enough to have been involved in both the Bellfield buy out by Action Porty and in the Portobello Central negotiations to bring Portobello Town Hall under community management and ownership.”
The article was output from the day we had @exploringedinburgh visiting so although Friday is not typically a Porty Central work day for me, things worked on earlier were bearing fruits yesterday,